
That takes restraint, preparedness, and creativity. Here Reynolds talks about how to connect to your audience through your presentation.
Brand & Strategy: What defines an effective presentation?
Garr Reynolds: I do not think in terms of performance, I think in terms of conversation–about how to best have a conversation or discussion about a subject with the audience.
The presentation is always about the message. The focus isn’t how I can make things easier for me; it’s how I can make the message more meaningful, relevant, and memorable for the audience.
Because they hide behind a list of facts or talking points. Many do it in an effort to ensure they have covered every possible base. But this isn’t best for the audience.
Facts, data, and information are plentiful. But a successful presentation brings more to the table. You want to connect the topic to the audience. And to do this, you must provide analysis, insights, and stories that back up your data or your case.
Why does the narrative approach sometimes fall flat?
Because it is irrelevant or off-topic. All stories must come back to support your underlying message. We remember stories and examples, but if they are not relevant or are not understood, they are just noise.
Are videos effective?
Relevant video clips work very well. I often use them to bring in other people to the talk (via the large screen) or to show actual examples from the field. They help tell the story for me.
But they can’t be superfluous.
When appropriate, they effectively illustrate your point: showing examples, bringing in other voices, and breaking up your talk in a way that adds interest.
What’s your advice for giving presentations without technology—going “analog” as you call it?
The same principles of Presentation Zen apply. If the approach did not apply to analog presentations, it would not be much of an approach.
Always keep in mind: Restraint in preparation; simplicity in design (or structure); and, naturalness in delivery.
I often only use a whiteboard. Some of the best talks I have heard have been delivered with only a whiteboard (or no visuals at all).
If it is only a small gathering of people around a table, slides on a screen are usually not necessary. It depends on the situation and the objectives, but for smaller meetings, it is usually enough to have some handouts and a good conversation around the table.
If you need to illustrate an idea, then use the whiteboard.
So you must evaluate the audience before you develop a presentation?
Yes, understanding your audience is key. Before the presentation, get as much information as possible about the audience and their expectations.
I think one always has to be careful of making claims without evidence to back it up, but this is especially true if you’re dealing with an audience that is accustomed to “seeing the numbers”—or the proof.
It’s also important to understand the culture of your audience. If I am speaking to a Japanese audience, for example, I give lots of examples and I provide a lot of time to respond during discussions.
Make sure you know who you are speaking to.
